«SHADOW» TRAIL OF THE NEUROART: FROM THE SACRED MONODY TO THE EUROPEAN PAINTING

Authors

  • Viktor Karpov
  • Natalia Syrotynska

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/uad.2022.2.2

Keywords:

shadow, neuroart, sacred monody, Еuropean painting, Skovoroda, Platonic cave, archetype, Carl Gustav Jung.

Abstract

The article focuses on the transformation of the image of the shadow in the art of different time periods. Different forms of its reflection are noted depending on the plane of image functioning. In the texts of the sacred hymnography, we find the perception of the shadow as a generalized symbol of protection, which arose on the basis of the peculiarities of the climatic conditions of living in the East. Instead, her mobility was reflected in images of a short life and a symbol of the Old Testament, which was replaced by the light of evangelical teaching. This interpretation of the shadow continued to be used and deepened in Ukrainian baroque poetry and Hryhoriy Skovorda works. Also considered the interpretation of the shadow as a metaphysical symbol that penetrates in Plato’s mythological thinking and Carl Gustav Jung's analytical psychology. The symbol of the shadows of Plato's cave in juxtaposition with Jung's archetypal imagery points to the deeper layers of human thinking. The irrationality of perceiving the world in the form of shadows on the wall or immersion in the dark layers of the subconscious emphasizes the importance of research into the human psyche and thought processes. The emergence of the newest scientific direction neuroart, acquires new opportunities the study of the mental processes related to artistic expressiveness. The persistence and relevance of the image of the shadow for thousands of years focuses attention on the key role of man, his mental activity and creative potential in creating his own picture of the world. In this way, the integrity of the perception of art of various styles is built, and the possibilities of neuroscience will allow to explore the deep inspirations of human creative thinking.

References

Ортега-и-Гассет Х. Искусство в настоящем и прошлом / Х. Ортега-и-Гассет. Эстетика. Философия культуры. Москва, 1991. С. 29–309.

Платон. Держава / пер. Д. Коваль. Книга VII. Київ : Основи, 2000. 355 с.

Сапфо / пер. А. Содомора. Львів, 2012. С. 47.

Сиротинська Н., Карпов В. Neuroart: мистецтво пізнання людини. Київ : НАКKКІМ, 2019. 80 с.

Сковорода Г. Діалог, или разглагол о древнем мірѣ. URL: http://litopys.org.ua/skovoroda/skov113.htm

Требник. 1719.

Усманова А. Умберто Эко: парадоксы интерпретации. Минск, 2000. С. 50.

Шеллинг Ф. Философия искусства. Москва : Мысль, 1966. С. 237.

Юнг К. Архетипи і колективне несвідоме. 2018. С. 608.

Яковина О. Метафізика в поезії. Україна XVII століття. Львів, 2010. С. 103.

Karpov V., Syrotynska N. Neuroаrt in the context of creativitу. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтва: наук. журнал. Київ : Міленіум, 2018. № 1. С. 21–36.

Karpov V., Syrotynska N. Homo parvus mundus est: imagination as a tool of knowledge and formation of the world. Вісник НАКККіМ. 2019. № 1. C. 42–46.

Soloviov O. Neuronal networks responsible for Genetic and Acquired (Ontogenetic) memory: probable fundamental differences. Neurophysiology. New-York, 2015. Vol. 47. P. 419–431.

Published

2022-09-21

How to Cite

Карпов, В. В., & Сиротинська, Н. І. (2022). «SHADOW» TRAIL OF THE NEUROART: FROM THE SACRED MONODY TO THE EUROPEAN PAINTING. Ukrainian Art Discourse, (2), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.32782/uad.2022.2.2

Issue

Section

Статті

Most read articles by the same author(s)